Beware pitfalls of cloud contracts

Think it’s just your business’ data being stored in the cloud these days? Think again. Some (or all) of the provisions of your contract with your cloud provider also may be “floating,” and can thus be changed at any time, often without notice to you.

How is this possible? Part of the blame rests with the modern-day trend of simplified contracts that include some brief general terms and conditions hyperlinked to online terms that can change at any time.

Typically, these contracts are presented on an as-is basis, and built-in protections, including service levels, generally provide only basic protection. Businesses then have little to no ability to terminate the agreement, even if key terms — including support obligations, service 

 

levels, service descriptions and performance standards — change to their disadvantage. Such key terms can change at any time, generally without notice.

As a result, businesses really can’t be assured that they will have key functionality and performance for their cloud-based system available when they need it. Even though you’re being asked to commit to purchasing a service, most of the elements that make that service valuable to you are not fixed.

Despite this, the customer is bound by the contract but the vendor is not, and can change the contract at any time.

With the advice of a trained legal professional, businesses that use cloud providers can mitigate some of these risks. Consider these suggestions:

1) Require contract terms to be put in writing and attached to the agreement as fixed provisions.

2) Build in language that makes clear the vendor cannot materially decrease the overall levels of performance and functionality reflected in the terms as of the date the contract is signed.

3) Set clear termination rights that protect the business in the event of:

  • Objective failure to achieve service levels.
  • Changes to the overall terms of the engagement if the content of one or more of the online portions of the agreement changes.
  • Changes to the vendor’s financial wherewithal or ownership.
  • Changes in applicable law or regulations.

4)  Long-term contracts should be avoided. Instead push for shorter initial terms with the right to renew for additional one-year periods.

 

What to avoid when signing an office lease

Unforeseen costs can crush a business that opts to sign an office lease without legal counsel. From initial construction costs to later capital improvements, the list of potential hidden costs is long and adds up quickly.

To avoid the possibility of paying several large bills down the line, ask your lawyer to help you negotiate a fair lease up front that covers the following, as necessary: a landlord-performed buildout, a tenant-performed buildout, operating expenses and end-of-lease condition.

 

Landlord-performed buildout

If the landlord is performing demolition and/or construction at the space you are planning to lease, crucial details need to be ironed out in advance and put in writing, including the nature and scope of the construction, a procedure for preparing and approving plans and specifications, the construction schedule and the approval of contractors.

It’s common to see a lease that includes a construction allowance, or set amount of money the landlord will pay, with any costs beyond that falling on the tenant.

Unless you have protections built into the lease to limit how much the landlord can spend on construction without your approval, the landlord has a “blank check” to incur construction costs in excess of the construction allowance. That is an even bigger concern when the construction is being performed by the landlord’s affiliated construction company, which is often the case.

 

Tenant-performed buildout

If you opt to handle buildout on your own, there is still the potential for hidden costs. A lease in this situation will typically provide that the premises are to be delivered by the landlord “as is,” with no obligation on the landlord’s part to perform any work or improvements prior to delivery. Thus, the landlord has no legal obligation to demolish the prior tenant’s installation, remove furniture, equipment or cabling, or address any issues or problems with the premises, such as correcting existing legal violations or removing hazardous materials. A legal professional can help write an agreement that shifts the burden of the delivery condition of the premises from the tenant to the landlord.

 

Operating expenses

Most leases require the tenant to pay its proportionate share of the operating expenses for the building, but there are certain things you should try to avoid. In particular, capital improvements — upgrades to the building performed by the landlord that enhance the value of the building — should not be the tenant’s responsibility. While you can be expected to pay a share of the day-to-day operating expenses of the building, as a tenant you should not pay for major upgrades to the building unless the landlord is required by law to perform the upgrade, or the upgrade results in greater efficiencies or reduces overall operating expenses for the building.

 

End-of-lease condition

When your lease is up and it’s time to turn the premises back over to the landlord, what are you obligated to do and what costs could come your way? Many leases require the tenant to remove its furniture, trade fixtures and equipment at the end of the lease term. Be careful to avoid provisions that make you responsible for restoring the premises to the condition that existed prior to the installation of any alterations or improvements you chose to make. Most leases provide that alterations or improvements installed by the tenant become the property of the landlord upon installation.